Policy & Regulation

Pro-XRP Lawyer Rips SEC’s Appeal, Expects Ripple to Win Big

Published

10 months ago

January 18, 2025

The US Securities and Trade Fee (SEC) has filed an enchantment within the ongoing case in opposition to Ripple, difficult a July 2023 court docket resolution that partially dismissed among the claims. Legal professional Jeremy Hogan mentioned the enchantment, explaining that the SEC is just interesting one particular ruling: that the XRP offered on exchanges to retail traders was not thought of a safety. The SEC doesn’t dispute the discovering that no traders have been harmed.

Weaknesses within the SEC briefing

Hogan finds the SEC’s letter weak and says a lot of it merely repeats what the decrease court docket already determined. The SEC is asking the appeals court docket to rule that it doesn’t must show that XRP patrons have been conscious of Ripple’s efforts to extend the worth of XRP. To assist this, the SEC factors to a few earlier instances, however Hogan argues that these instances do not likely assist the SEC’s place.

Ripple will probably dispute SEC’s argument

Hogan predicts that Ripple will vigorously dispute the SEC’s argument in its response. The perfect argument for assist from the SEC is the Aqua-Sonic case, however Hogan stated the SEC has to piece collectively statements from completely different elements of the case to make it work, and even then it would not match properly with Ripple’s scenario .

SEC’s missed alternative with proof

Hogan can be shocked that the SEC is just not addressing proof from XRP patrons who knew nothing of Ripple’s actions, particularly given the hundreds of affidavits filed by lawyer John Deaton. The SEC’s incapability to refute this proof may harm their case in the long term.

READ Ripple is applying for a national bank charter, LET Mining creates more value for XRP holders

Doable impression of the career

If the enchantment proceeds and the court docket upholds the retail gross sales ruling, it may create a sticky scenario for the SEC. They must show that patrons have been conscious of Ripple’s promotional efforts, which might be difficult and time-consuming. Moreover, this name may permit Ripple to make new arguments about what constitutes an ‘funding contract’, probably strengthening their place.