Policy & Regulation
The GENIUS Act Banned Yield on Stablecoins– But Banks Are Still Losing Against The Competition

Credit : cryptonews.net
The GENIUS Act accommodates an essential rule that prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying curiosity on to holders. Whereas this provision was seemingly meant to guard banks from shedding deposits, it has inadvertently created a extremely worthwhile regulatory loophole.
The rule supplies enterprise alternatives for crypto exchanges and fintech distributors. They will now leverage this income and switch it into a strong engine for innovation.
The right way to Bypass the Stablecoin Yield Ban
A key characteristic that has sparked a lot debate in gentle of the GENIUS Act is the prohibition on stablecoin issuers from paying curiosity or returns on to the one who owns the stablecoin. In doing so, the regulation strengthens stablecoins as a easy cost methodology relatively than an funding or retailer of worth that competes with financial institution financial savings accounts.
The availability was seen as a conciliatory measure to maintain financial institution lobbyists blissful and guarantee passage of the GENIUS Act. Nonetheless, stablecoin distributors have found a loophole within the tremendous print of the laws and are making the most of it.
The regulation solely prohibits the issuer from paying returns, however doesn’t prohibit a 3rd celebration, equivalent to a crypto trade, from doing so. This hole makes a worthwhile answer potential.
The banking foyer is livid concerning the proceeds from stablecoins underneath the GENIUS Act. They name it a ‘loophole’ that must be closed.
However here is what they’re lacking: we have seen this film earlier than. And it has constructed an entire technology of fintech firms.
🧵
— Simon Taylor (@sytaylor) October 5, 2025
The issuer, which receives curiosity from the underlying reserves, equivalent to U.S. Treasury bonds, passes that revenue on to the distributor. The distributor then makes use of this income as a direct funding supply to supply excessive rates of interest to customers.
Coinbase is a main instance of this phenomenon. It receives a portion of the returns that issuers like Circle and Tether generate for companies and buyer acquisition. Subsequently, it affords customers who maintain USDC or USDT on its platform a excessive annual return of 4.1%.
This method creates a aggressive benefit over conventional banks by providing extra engaging returns and a extra engaging person expertise. The banking sector has responded to this problem by expressing clear opposition.
Banks warn of giant outflow of deposits
In August, the Banking Coverage Institute urged Congress, which is at the moment debating a crypto market construction invoice, to tighten stablecoin rules.
“With out an specific ban on exchanges, which function a distribution channel for stablecoin issuers or enterprise companions, the necessities within the GENIUS Act can simply be circumvented and undermined by permitting oblique cost of curiosity to stablecoin holders,” the letter stated.
Financial institution deposits would be the worst hit. In April, a Treasury Division report estimated that stablecoins may result in as a lot as $6.6 trillion in deposit outflows. Now that third-party distributors will pay curiosity on stablecoins, deposit flight is more likely to enhance.
The banking foyer has already self-imposed a ban on interest-bearing stablecoins to guard its authorized moat for deposits.
Now the banks are shaking over rewards applications. Apparently stablecoins are solely okay if the holders actually get nothing.
You do not hate TradFi sufficient.
— Jake Chervinsky (@jchervinsky) September 11, 2025
As a result of banks depend on deposits as the principle supply of funding for issuing loans, a decline in these deposits inevitably limits the banking sector’s capability to supply credit score.
Nonetheless, banks have confronted comparable existential threats previously.
Classes from the 2011 Durbin Modification
Based on a thread from FinTech skilled Simon Taylor on
Congress handed this laws to scale back the charges retailers needed to pay to banks when a buyer used a debit card. Earlier than the modification’s passage, these charges have been unregulated and excessive. For banks, this represented an essential and steady income that funded issues like free checking accounts and rewards applications.
The interchange charge was restricted to a really low fee for banks with greater than $10 billion in property. The loophole, nevertheless, lay within the exception that explicitly excludes any financial institution with lower than $10 billion in property from the compensation cap.
These small, ‘Durbin-exempt’ banks may nonetheless cost the previous, unregulated charge.
Fintech startups, trying to construct shopper merchandise at low or no price, rapidly realized this chance. Firms like Chime and Money App rapidly partnered with these small banks to concern their very own debit playing cards.
The associate financial institution would obtain the excessive interbank income and share it with the FinTech firm. This important income stream allowed FinTechs to supply free accounts as a result of they made a lot from shared swipe charges.
“Conventional banks could not compete. They have been regulated by Durbin and made half the trade per transaction. In the meantime, neobanks partnered with group banks and constructed billion-dollar companies on the unfold. The playbook: Distributor captures worth and shares it with prospects,” Taylor wrote on X.
An identical sample is now occurring with stablecoins.
Will banks resist or adapt?
The GENIUS Act loophole for stablecoin distributors permits a strong new enterprise mannequin that gives a built-in funding supply for brand spanking new rivals. In consequence, innovation outdoors the normal banking system will speed up.
On this case, crypto exchanges or fintech startups are free of the prices and complexity of a financial institution constitution. As an alternative, they deal with consumer-facing elements equivalent to person expertise and market progress.
Distributors’ revenue from the proceeds handed to them by stablecoin issuers permits them to supply extra engaging buyer rewards or fund product growth. The result’s an objectively higher, cheaper and quicker product than the deposits of present banks.
Whereas these banks could achieve closing this loophole with the approaching Market Construction Act, historical past suggests {that a} new hole will inevitably emerge that may gasoline the subsequent wave of innovation.
Somewhat than combating this new construction with resistance from regulators, the smarter long-term technique for incumbent banks could also be to adapt and combine this rising infrastructure layer into their operations.
The put up The GENIUS Act Banned Stablecoin Returns – However Banks Nonetheless Lose Towards the Competitors appeared first on BeInCrypto.
-
Meme Coin7 months ago
DOGE Sees Massive User Growth: Active Addresses Up 400%
-
Blockchain1 year ago
Orbler Partners with Meta Lion to Accelerate Web3 Growth
-
Videos1 year ago
Shocking Truth About TRON! TRX Crypto Review & Price Predictions!
-
Meme Coin1 year ago
Crypto Whale Buys the Dip: Accumulates PEPE and ETH
-
NFT9 months ago
SEND Arcade launches NFT entry pass for Squad Game Season 2, inspired by Squid Game
-
Solana4 months ago
Solana Price to Target $200 Amid Bullish Momentum and Staking ETF News?
-
Ethereum1 year ago
5 signs that the crypto bull run is coming this September
-
Gaming1 year ago
GameFi Trends in 2024